One of the more troubling trends I’ve noticed in Christian conversations is the habit of calling every viewpoint we dislike “demonic.” I’ve seen it applied to abortion, to “transgender ideology,” and to other cultural issues. While it’s true that evil spiritual beings influence the structures and patterns of this world, labeling everything we oppose as “demonic” is neither helpful nor accurate.
Why? Because the moment we throw out the word “demonic,” we effectively shut down dialogue. That label doesn’t invite conversation—it ends it. If I believe your position is demonic, then why would you listen to me? Why would you try to understand my point of view? Your only option is to resist me, rather than reason with me.
As followers of Jesus, aren’t we called to do more than shout down our opponents? Aren’t we called to persuade, to love, and to embody the truth in ways that draw others in rather than drive them away?
There’s another danger, too. It’s easy to reserve the label “demonic” for ideas we already dislike while overlooking how evil spiritual forces influence things we personally support. For example, some Christians are quick to call abortion demonic, but slow to acknowledge the demonic influence behind war, nationalism, patriotism, racism, or unjust economic systems. If Satan truly masquerades as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14), then his influence may be most dangerous where we least expect it—among the things we feel most comfortable with.
I’ll be honest: I struggle with this myself. Recently I shared a post on Facebook that said, “A person being murdered is only rationalized by the depraved and only celebrated by the demonic.” I could rationalize my sharing of that statement, and in one sense I do believe it captures truth. But it also reminded me how easy it is to use the word “demonic” to make a point. It feels strong and clarifying, but if I’m not careful, it can oversimplify complex realities or shut down conversation. I also fear that using the word “demonic” can dehumanize people on the other side. That tension between being helpful and creating barriers is exactly why I need to be cautious with my language.
This is where Paul’s example in Acts 17 is so helpful. When he stood in Athens surrounded by idols, he didn’t start by condemning their worship as demonic—even though idolatry is clearly opposed to God. Instead, he looked for common ground. “People of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious” (Acts 17:22). Rather than shutting the conversation down with a harsh label, he opened it up with respect and curiosity. He even quoted their own poets to build a bridge. Only after establishing that connection did he clearly point them to the true God and call them to repentance.
Paul shows us a better way. He didn’t deny the reality of spiritual darkness, but he also didn’t weaponize that truth to silence his listeners. Instead, he used it as a foundation for dialogue and an opportunity for witness. That’s the model we need today.
The Apostle Paul also reminds us in Ephesians 6:12 that our struggle “is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.” Yes, there are spiritual powers at work behind the brokenness of this world. But recognizing that should make us humble, not careless with our words. It should drive us to prayer, discernment, and faithful living—not to weaponizing the word “demonic” as a way of dismissing those who disagree with us.
When Christians casually call opposing views “demonic,” we misrepresent the gospel. We risk treating people as enemies rather than fellow humans made in God’s image. We give ourselves an excuse not to love, not to listen, not to engage. Instead, we are called to see people as captives in need of liberation, not as enemies to be destroyed.
So the next time we’re tempted to use “demonic” as a quick label, let’s pause. Let’s remember that spiritual forces are at work everywhere—not just in the causes we oppose, but in the ones we embrace. And let’s choose the harder, better way: to engage with compassion, to reason with gentleness, and to bear witness to the kingdom of God without relying on shortcuts that shut the conversation down.
No comments:
Post a Comment